Reference Terminal Clarification


Subject: Reference Terminal Clarification
From: Ramesh Mayiladuthurai (rameshm@cadence.com)
Date: Fri Jan 25 2002 - 06:59:57 PST


Working Group,

        I would like to get a clarification on the usage of "reference"
        terminal of a nature.

        The LRM, sec 3.5(.1) states that

        "A nature defines values that may be accessed through the
        attributes of a terminal. These attributes include its
        compatibility with other terminals, the reference terminal of
        the nature, and its across type and through type .... "

        "A scalar nature definition defines a scalar nature, its
         branch types, and the name of its reference terminal"

        1. There are attributes 'across and 'through that can access the
            across and through types of a nature but there is none defined
           that can access the "reference" terminal of a nature.

        2. Does the appearence of reference terminal "name" in a nature
           definition imply an implicit terminal "declaration" ? If that is
           true, what would be the nature of this "reference" terminal ?

        3. Continuing from the previous query, is it valid to declare
           something like ...

           ---------------------------------------------------------
           nature elect is volt across current through gnd reference;

           terminal t1: elect;

           quantity q1 across gnd to t1; -- Is this a valid declaration ?
           ---------------------------------------------------------

        Thanks for your help in clarifying the same.

regards,

Ramesh



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jan 25 2002 - 07:19:54 PST