TWiki
>
P1647 Web
>
MeetingS
>
Meeting72minutes
(2012-04-25,
BrettLammers
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
<p align="center"> *Meeting 72* *Minutes* </p> Teleconference, Monday, April 23, 2012, 1600 UTC; 9:00 am Pacific Standard Time _A quorum of 6_ <em>out of 6 voting members present. 5 non-voting members were also present. <br />Attendance and voter status indicated on the </em> _<a target="_blank" href="http://www.eda.org/twiki/pub/P1647/WebHome/ieee1647_online_roster.xls">on-line roster</a>_ _._ *Attendees* * Voting members * Brett Lammers * Andrew Piziali * Yaron Kashai * Matan Vax * Darren Galpin * Joe Hupcey * Non-voting members * Iraklis Diamantidis * Mike Bartley * Kishore Karnane * Hannes Froehlich * Amy Witherow *1. Call to order meeting 72 on April 23rd at 9:05m PST (1605 UTC)* *2. Approval of Oct 10th meeting 71 minutes* * Solicit motion to approve the meeting 71 minutes * Mike B. motions to approve meeting 71 minutes * Yaron K. seconded * Meeting 71 Minutes approved *3. Status update* * *April 23 Status* * There is an issue submitted on the currently submittted draft. The key word "consume" is usedin the key word table but not defined elswhere in the spec * This key word does have functionality with regards to events * Darren: Needs to go into next version. Darren will reply to Mantis issue * Structured Debug Messages and Reflection Enhancements have not yet been added to Mantis. * Matan will add * Other enhancements * Joe: Should we add something around UVMe? * Matan: There are some new things here (tesflow phases, UVM scoreboard, Low power) * Maybe should not be included in LRM as it is an open source and already part of another spec/methodology (i.e. UVM) * Implemented in 100% standard e as a library and no language changes/additions * Hannes: Specman RnD working on sets. * Darren will work with Hannes to get this into Mantis * Matan: A lot of work has been Constraint semantics (order, implications etc). Now there are very clear definitions that could update what is in the LRM * Most pproblematic in the past has been order. There has been a lot of work here in Specman including a new solver. * Improvements in lists, when subtypes etc * Matan to go through LRM and propose changes relative to constraint solving in Mantis issue * Matan: There is also generalization of "on <event>". Now it can be used for events outside of the current scope. * Matan to create a note in Mantis * What is the status of a new LRM version * Still waiting for last version to close out * Would need to submit request for new version (i.e. new PAR) * Then would ask for donations (i.e. Cadence to submit docs on features) * When is the right time? * Add in the items that came in todays meeting into mantis (mentioned above) * Wait for a few more months and see if we want a new version * *Oct 11 Status* * <p> *Standard has been published..What Next?* </p> * Darren proposes waiting 6 mo or more to gather feedback on the current version * Joe reported that this seems in line with guidance from Stan Krolikoski * Andy P. asked if there were enhancement requests etc that have come in since the standard * Darren is concerned that he is not connected to updates made by Cadence * Matan offered up the following enhancements that have occured * Multi-dimensional lists - (actually this was addressed in the latest version as a tool limitation) * Reflection API updates - Has been extended in the current Specman version * Structured Debug Messages - generalization of the message construct * Darren asked if when Matan sees such changes that he could submit them as enhancements requests (Mantis) * Andy P. asked what we should do about updates that we voted to leave behind in this latest version. * Only temporal coverage was left behind by vote. * Does not seem to have customer demand * *July 11th Status* * <p> *Final draft passed last ballot* </p> * Last step waiting for IEEE editorial staff comments if any * <p> *Update to our P&P's (bylaws)* </p> * Darren made the required updates based on the DASC updates * Darren G. proposes a verbal Ballot during the meeting to accept * Yaron K. seconded the motion * Vote results - * Voting members (4 approved, 1 abstained) * Brett Lammers -Approved * Andrew Piziali - Abstained * Darren Galpin - Approved * Yaron Kashai - Approved * Joe Hupcey - Approved * Non-voting members (3 Approved, 1 Abstained) * Mike Bartley - Approved * Iraklis Diamantidis - Approved * Amy Witherow - Abstained * Kishore Karnane - Approved * New bylaws approved based on 4 out 7 voting members approval * <p> *Action Items* </p> * <p>None</p> * *Editor Slot* * <p> *Apr 23rd Update* </p> * <p>No Update</p> * <p> *Oct 11 Update* </p> * <p>No Update</p> * <p> *July 11 Update* </p> * <p>No Update</p> * <p> *Mar 28 Update* </p> * <p>No Update</p> * <p> *Feb 14 Update* </p> * <p>Amy will make the changes she can and wait for additional input on the issues that needed additioanl feedback.</p> * <p>New version will include "internal review" change bars</p> * <p>Amy and Darren will exchange the spreadsheet to track the issues and respond correctly to the SA website</p> * <p> *Dec 13 Update* </p> * <p>Would like to talk with Darren</p> * <p>about how to backup final <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.eda.org/twiki/bin/edit.cgi/P1647/FrameMaker?topicparent=P1647.Meeting67Minutes;nowysiwyg=0" title="FrameMaker (this topic does not yet exist; you can create it)">FrameMaker</a> files</p> * <p>who should Amy work with to provide source files to IEEE</p> * <p> *Sept 13 Update* </p> * <p>Will create new draft for ratification</p> * <p>Proposal to create a version for WG balloting that contains change bars.</p> * <p>Draft for SA balloting will not contain change bars.</p> *4. Other business* * *Any other business?* * Mail a message to <a target="_blank" href="mailto:ieee1647@edaNOSPAM.org">ieee1647@edaNOSPAM.org</a> (the general email reflector) if you were not recorded in these minutes *5. Call for essential patents* * <p>The IEEE-SA updated the patent policy effective April 2008</p> * <p>The details are available in updated slide set at <a target="_blank" href="http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf">http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf</a>. (See "Patent related" from the IEEE 1647 home page, "Slides About IEEE Patent Policy").</p> * <p>If you believe that any patent claims are essential patent claims, please inform the working group. Review the posted slides for more information.</p> *6. Next meeting* * <p>Sept 10th at 9 am PST ( *1600 UTC* )</p> *7. Adjourn* * <p>Mike B??. motioned</p> * <p>Andy P. seconded</p> * <p>Motion approved</p> * <p>Meeting adjourned at 9:31 PDT (16:31 UTC)</p> -- Main.BrettLammers - 2012-04-23
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r4
<
r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r4 - 2012-04-25 - 14:01:33 -
BrettLammers
P1647
Log In
or
Register
P1647 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback