Alain, We already discussed #1 in another thread, so I will leave that subject alone now. Regarding #2, the S-parameter request, I was more thinking along the lines of digital printed circuit board (PCB) design, although RF design is certainly a valid application. S-parameters are often used for describing connectors, packages, PCB traces, etc... and there are times when it would be desirable to have lossy interconnect models in VHDL-AMS simulations for such components. Unfortunately, as far as I know, there is currently no way to use S-parameter data in VHDL-AMS for such purposes. At some time in the past I thought there may be ways to write equations to convert the S-parameter data to a transfer function that could be used with the Laplace function, but this is not a trivial task. This is why I thought that adding direct support for S-parameter data in VHDL-AMS may be a good idea. Thanks, Arpad ========================================================== -----Original Message----- From: Alain Vachoux [mailto:alain.vachoux@epfl.ch] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 8:38 AM To: Muranyi, Arpad Cc: 1076.1 mailing list Subject: Re: [1076.1] Proposals for new features open for discussion Arpad, Here are my comments to the topics you are proposing as new features to the VHDL-AMS language: 1) Support for encryption has been added to the upcoming VHDL 1076-2007 standard. As far as I know, it still has been to be ratified by the IEEE so it may take some time before the encryption technology is available to VHDL end users. Nevertheless, the 1076.1 standard will naturally endorse the new technology as soon as it is supported in EDA tools. 2) I proposed a process for managing proposals for new features. Your idea is certainly a starting point. However, if there is enough resonance around the topic, then the proposal should be developped further along the lines of the defined process. Can you elaborate a bit further on that? Are you proposing this in the context of supporting RF applications in VHDL-AMS? Best regards, Alain -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue May 15 10:26:19 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 15 2007 - 10:26:38 PDT