Peter, Thanks for your reply. I hope this oversight will/can be corrected in the next rev of the book (if there is one planned). The inconsistency you mentioned is really interesting, especially with such similar attributes. Do you know of any plans for making such things more consistent in future revs of the language? Thanks, Arpad ====================================================== -----Original Message----- From: Peter Ashenden [mailto:peter@ashenden.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 4:21 PM To: Muranyi, Arpad; vhdl-ams@eda.org Subject: RE: What does 'last_event really return? Arpad, Thanks for raising the issue in our book. You're right that we overlooked the real-valued form of the 'last_event attribute. My aplogies for that. Note that, curiously, VHDL-AMS does not also define a real-valued form of the 'last_active attribute, only the TIME-valued form from VHDL. Cheers, PA -- Dr. Peter J. Ashenden peter@ashenden.com.au Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd. www.ashenden.com.au PO Box 640 VoIP: 0871270078@sip.internode.on.net Stirling, SA 5152 Phone (mobile): +61 414 709 106 AustraliaReceived on Wed Feb 15 23:01:40 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 15 2006 - 23:04:03 PST