RE: Checking for dimensional consistency in VHDL-AMS models

Subject: RE: Checking for dimensional consistency in VHDL-AMS models
From: Eduard Moser (moser@fli.sh.bosch.de)
Date: Mon Dec 27 1999 - 03:00:55 PST

• Next message: Alain Vachoux: "New 1076.1 Chair"
• Previous message: Bakalar, Kenneth: "RE: Checking for dimensional consistency in VHDL-AMS models"
• In reply to: Bakalar, Kenneth: "RE: Checking for dimensional consistency in VHDL-AMS models"
• Reply: Eduard Moser: "RE: Checking for dimensional consistency in VHDL-AMS models"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Ken,

> Why do you not declare and use different natures for sets of incompatible
> ports? What additional characteristics of the port are encoded in the
> attribute?

You are right as long as PORT TERMINAL is concerned.
My suggestion was proposed only for PORT QUANTITY.

Eduard Moser

-- 
Robert Bosch GmbH                          Tel: +49-711-811-6924
FV/FLI, Postfach 10 60 50                  Fax: +49-711-811-7602
70049 Stuttgart, Germany                   E-mail: moser@fli.sh.bosch.de

• Next message: Alain Vachoux: "New 1076.1 Chair"
• Previous message: Bakalar, Kenneth: "RE: Checking for dimensional consistency in VHDL-AMS models"
• In reply to: Bakalar, Kenneth: "RE: Checking for dimensional consistency in VHDL-AMS models"
• Reply: Eduard Moser: "RE: Checking for dimensional consistency in VHDL-AMS models"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jan 26 2000 - 15:58:34 PST