(r1) Meeting70Minutes < P1647

P1647 Web>MeetingS>Meeting70Minutes (revision 1) (raw view)~~EditAttach~~
<p align="center"> *Meeting 70* *Minutes* </p>

Teleconference, Monday, July 11, 2011, 1600 UTC; 9:00 am Pacific Daylight Time

_A quorum of 5_ <em>out of 7 voting members present. 4 non-voting members were also present. <br />Attendance and voter status indicated on the </em> _<a target="_blank" href="http://www.eda.org/twiki/pub/P1647/WebHome/ieee1647_online_roster.xls">on-line roster</a>_ _._

*Attendees*
   * Voting members 
      * Brett Lammers
      * Andrew Piziali
      * Darren Galpin
      * Yaron Kashai
      * Joe Hupcey

   * Non-voting members 
      * Mike Bartley
      * Iraklis Diamantidis
      * Amy Witherow
      * Kishore Karnane

*1. Call to order meeting 70 on Jul 11th at 9:04m PDT (1604 UTC)*

*2. Approval of March 28th meeting 69 minutes*
   * Solicit motion to approve the meeting 69 minutes
   * Andy P. motions to approve meeting 69 minutes
   * Yaron K. seconded
   * Meeting 69 Minutes approved

*3. Status update*
   * *Final draft passed last ballot* 
      * Last step waiting for IEEE editorial staff comments if any

   * *Update to our P&P's (bylaws)* 
      * Darren made the required updates based on the DASC updates
      * Darren G. proposes a verbal Ballot during the meeting to accept
      * Yaron K. seconded the motion
      * Vote results - 
         * Voting members (4 approved, 1 abstained) 
            * Brett Lammers -Approved
            * Andrew Piziali - Abstained
            * Darren Galpin - Approved
            * Yaron Kashai - Approved
            * Joe Hupcey - Approved
         * Non-voting members (3 Approved, 1 Abstained) 
            * Mike Bartley - Approved
            * Iraklis Diamantidis - Approved
            * Amy Witherow - Abstained
            * Kishore Karnane - Approved
      * New bylaws approved based on 4 out 7 voting members approval

   * <p> *Action Items* </p>
      * <p>None</p>

   * *Editor Slot* 
      * <p> *July 11 Update* </p>
         * <p>No Update</p>
      * <p> *Mar 28 Update* </p>
         * <p>No Update</p>
      * <p> *Feb 14 Update* </p>
         * <p>Amy will make the changes she can and wait for additional input on the issues that needed additioanl feedback.</p>
         * <p>New version will include "internal review" change bars</p>
         * <p>Amy and Darren will exchange the spreadsheet to track the issues and respond correctly to the SA website</p>
      * <p> *Dec 13 Update* </p>
         * <p>Would like to talk with Darren</p>
            * <p>about how to backup final <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.eda.org/twiki/bin/edit.cgi/P1647/FrameMaker?topicparent=P1647.Meeting67Minutes;nowysiwyg=0" title="FrameMaker (this topic does not yet exist; you can create it)">FrameMaker</a> files</p>
            * <p>who should Amy work with to provide source files to IEEE</p>
      * <p> *Sept 13 Update* </p>
         * <p>Will create new draft for ratification</p>
         * <p>Proposal to create a version for WG balloting that contains change bars.</p>
         * <p>Draft for SA balloting will not contain change bars</p>
      * <p> *July 26 Update* </p>
         * <p>Been working to turn around any Mantis issues in about 1 day.</p>
      * <p> *June 21 Update* </p>
         * <p>Amy will release a new draft after reviewing any new issues from Matan</p>
         * <p>Amy will also need a list of reviewers to add to the document</p>
      * <p> *May 24 Update* </p>
         * <p>waiting for Mantis issues to be resolved and produce a new draft.</p>
      * <p> *April 19 Update* </p>
         * <p>Need to talk to someone about using Mantis (Darren to follow-up after meeting)</p>
      * <p> *March 8 Update* </p>
         * <p>Have not had time to make much progress since the last meeting but should be starting back up soon</p>
      * <p> *February 8 Update* </p>
         * Should code examples be removed? 
            * Yes examples longer then a small syntactic example should be removed. This was the practice in the previous releases
         * Should references to Specman Docs be removed? 
            * Yes non public references should be removed. This was the practice in the previous releases

*4. Other business*
   * *Any other business?*
   * Mail a message to <a target="_blank" href="mailto:ieee1647@edaNOSPAM.org">ieee1647@edaNOSPAM.org</a> (the general email reflector) if you were not recorded in these minutes

*5. Call for essential patents*
   * <p>The IEEE-SA updated the patent policy effective April 2008</p>
   * <p>The details are available in updated slide set at <a target="_blank" href="http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf">http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.pdf</a>. (See "Patent related" from the IEEE 1647 home page, "Slides About IEEE Patent Policy").</p>
   * <p>If you believe that any patent claims are essential patent claims, please inform the working group. Review the posted slides for more information.</p>

*6. Next meeting*
   * <p>Oct 10th at 9 am PST ( *1600 UTC* )</p>

*7. Adjourn*
   * <p>Joe H. motioned</p>
   * <p>Andy P. seconded</p>
   * <p>Motion approved</p>
   * <p>Meeting adjourned at 9:16 PDT (16:16 UTC)</p>

-- Main.BrettLammers - 2011-07-11
Topic revision: r1 - 2011-07-12 - 13:34:36 - TWikiGuest
P1647